Comments on: Library 360

By: TangognaT » Ask Tangognat: Web 2.0 and Libraries

TangognaT » Ask Tangognat: Web 2.0 and Libraries — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 03:55:27 +0000

[...] really the last person to ask about this topic for various reasons, but I’ll give it a [...]

By: Pete

Pete — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:25:08 +0000

What really gets me about much of this Library 2.0 stuff is its ahistoricity (to quote Walt) and its asocialicity (to make up a word.) There’s little to no sense of the social aspects of libraries, technology…people. I wonder what William Wisner or Sandy Berman make of all this

By: blyberg.net » Library 2.0: The road ahead

blyberg.net » Library 2.0: The road ahead — Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:12:55 +0000

[...] It does seems somewhat arbitrary that a term like “Library 2.0″ can be coined, snatched up, and tossed about like a hacky-sack at Burning Man. I agree that it’s not quite the right label, but to be honest, I really don’t care–if we’re arguing over semantics, we’ve been derailed. So as I use the term “Library 2.0″ (L2), bear in mind that it’s only a way for me to refer to a collective of ideas. [...]

By: tangognat

tangognat — Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:41:51 +0000

But “Master Chief” is in Halo!!!!

By: Patricia Uttaro

Patricia Uttaro — Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:23:35 +0000

Regarding Library 360 feature 7 - I personally would prefer “Maestra” (term borrowed from Tom Robbins) or perhaps, for my male compatriots, “Mr. Sir” (borrowed from Louis Sachar’s brilliant novel “Holes.”)

By: Library Views 圖書館觀點

Library Views 圖書館觀點 — Sat, 03 Dec 2005 07:16:10 +0000

Library 360

By: See Also

See Also — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:44:57 +0000

Library 2.0 / Library 360 / Library 3-D

Some time soon I plan to jump into the Library 2.0 / Web 2.0 fray (I have no idea what it means, but I’m for it! I want my Library 2.0!), but in the meantime, I’m digging TangognaT’s snarky post…

By: Information Wants To Be Free » Blog Archive » Cool things I found this week

Fri, 02 Dec 2005 02:45:40 +0000

[...] Tangognat’s Library 360: Snarky, but I can’t resist spartan armor! [...]

By: tangognat

tangognat — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:26:19 +0000

Any movement that is hard to understand or nebulous has some problems. I don’t dismiss the idea of increased collaboration or taking cues from emerging social software in developing library applications, but the term “Library 2.0″ seems to be so vague it could mean almost anything.

I would not be surprised to find out that Library 2.0 can also make french fries and tie my shoes.

By: Thomas

Thomas — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:24:23 +0000

Great! Library 360 this x-mas. Certainly gives the message that the library can deliver a lot (that it cannot do today), you just have to buy all the add-ons to get full functionality.
I prefer Library 2.0. It is hard to understand because it is new and demands new ways of thinking. That it is hard to get is no excuse to dismiss the concept and just continue on our merry way to oblivion!